
photo credit: SMN
Right now, and for the last few days, there has been a internet storm brewing over a woman who has been publicly sharing her abortion online. Oh the firestorm this has caused, with temper flaring on all sides of the debate.
Yesterday I tweeted about an article I read on her choice Tweeting an abortion: A blogger takes to Twitter and YouTube as she terminates her pregnancy, and women should thank her. Now, the article discusses how her decision to be public rather than shameful and secretive takes away some of the stigma around abortion. Which I agree is a good thing. Unfortunately, not everyone feels that way. Not even on my “side”. Which is why I received this reply:
I’m prochoice, not proabortion
OK. Pro-abortion. What does that mean? Well, it depends on which side you are coming from.
See, the anti-choice/pro-life people use pro-abortion as both an insult, and a reflection of their own goals. Many, many, many (despite the rhetoric) do not actually want women to “choose life”. I had an argument with one the other day who said my children will grow to hate me if they find I chose to have them, that they were choices. No, “choosing” life is not the goal. Having pregnancy forced upon a woman for her punishment of sex is the real goal. There is no choice involved.
So, when they say “choose life” and think “do it because you have to”, they assume the opposite is true. That when I say “choose” I must mean, as they would, “do it because you have to”. Where my “have to” must naturally be abortion. Therefore, to be pro-choice is to be pro-abortion in that I protest at maternity clinics and want to drag pregnant women kicking and screaming in abortion clinic all the time. You know, like them but the opposite.

photo credit: alexandralee
Then there is the other side. The “prochoice, not proabortion” side.
I’m going to assume that if you are pro-choice, then you are aware that I do not actually want to force every woman into an abortion whether she wants it or not. So we’ll strike that out as an option. What’s left. Well, I’ve noticed that a lot who are “not proabotion” tend to phrase their pro-choice stance with a clause. You know the “I’m pro-choice, but I would never have an abortion.” Hell, I used to say the same thing.
Until it was pointed out to me that there’s really no need to add the escape clause at the end. That adding it in does not stop the anti-choicers from wanting to hurl stones at my head, and often makes women who did have abortions feel othered and shamed. Shit. What exactly is the real purpose of adding in that “but”. Why not just say “I’m pro-choice” and be done with it. Does it really matter whether or not you personally would make that choice at all?
Look, I’m not saying that the people who say this do it intentionally. Most probably never even considered what that extra statement even means. But, when you are told you are saying something offensive there are 2 ways to deal. Either become hyper-defensive and scream that you were not saying what the person said, or thank them and spend some time honestly reflecting on their comment.
So, assuming that you do not believe pro-choice people desire to force abortions on every woman, what is wrong with being pro-abortion? Is it not a viable choice? Does it not have benefits? Are there not reasons to choose it? Even if you want to lower the rates that abortions are performed by better education and health care, and we all do, does that make abortions themselves something not to be in support of when it is what the woman chooses to do so?
If you are not pro-abortion, are you honestly pro-choice?

photo credit: SarahDeer
To me, it feels like another version of the “but I…” clause. It creates an othering, attempts to place yourself in neutral territory by throwing a bone to the anti-choice side while still supporting women’s choice (and throwing the women who do make it under the bus). Frankly, it reeks of slut shaming. “I totally support your choice, but I would never do it because I’m a good girl and always safe and perfect and love babies and you should totally be ashamed and quiet and hidden and only openly weep about the horrible choice you were forced to make if the topic ever comes up. But I totally support you!”
You do not need to add an escape clause. You do not need to draw a line between yourself and those women who do have abortions. It is OK to be pro-abortion (in the rational sense, not the anti-choice fictional world sense). Abortion is a safe, viable health option and it is a good thing to support this option for the women who use it.Women who have abortions should not be quiet, or ashamed, or hidden away. In fact, they should make YouTube videos and blogs about it and have conversations on Twitter about it the same way we talk about birth and breastfeeding and menstruation and budgeting advice and aggravating partners. And they should not feel like the people who claim to support them are doing so while drawing a line across the floor to separate them.

photo credit: gruntzooki